<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Canon EOS 40D	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.roumazeilles.net/news/en/wordpress/2006/09/09/canon-eos-40d/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.roumazeilles.net/news/en/wordpress/2006/09/09/canon-eos-40d/</link>
	<description>Technology opinions and others</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:13:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.roumazeilles.net/news/en/wordpress/2006/09/09/canon-eos-40d/#comment-649</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.roumazeilles.net/news/en/wordpress/2006/09/09/canon-eos-40d/#comment-649</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The issue is not whether the SD cards are amateur or not. But most people already using a D-SLR have CompactFlash slabs available. Virtually all D-SLR are still using CF.

Moreover, it is technically simple. The CF is larger in size, so more chips go into it and the result is that the CompactFlash contains more data than the same technology SD.

However, this line is blurring under the pressure of several factors:

* SD max capacity is now becoming &quot;enough&quot; even for big sensor D-SLRs.

* Price of both SD and CF has gone quite low compared to the price of the camera itself.

So manufacturers more and more are moving to SD, once reserved to compact cameras. We can expect that all new DSLR products in 2008 will be using SD cards. It&#039;s an on-going trend.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue is not whether the SD cards are amateur or not. But most people already using a D-SLR have CompactFlash slabs available. Virtually all D-SLR are still using CF.</p>
<p>Moreover, it is technically simple. The CF is larger in size, so more chips go into it and the result is that the CompactFlash contains more data than the same technology SD.</p>
<p>However, this line is blurring under the pressure of several factors:</p>
<p>* SD max capacity is now becoming &#8220;enough&#8221; even for big sensor D-SLRs.</p>
<p>* Price of both SD and CF has gone quite low compared to the price of the camera itself.</p>
<p>So manufacturers more and more are moving to SD, once reserved to compact cameras. We can expect that all new DSLR products in 2008 will be using SD cards. It&#8217;s an on-going trend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mrwingtipshoes		</title>
		<link>https://www.roumazeilles.net/news/en/wordpress/2006/09/09/canon-eos-40d/#comment-645</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mrwingtipshoes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 05:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.roumazeilles.net/news/en/wordpress/2006/09/09/canon-eos-40d/#comment-645</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How is the use of SD cards amateurish? smaller, less likely to damage, just as fast, just as big and.... cheaper! I Guess that the Canon 1DS Mark II is an &quot;amateur&quot; camera because it useses SD cards too!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is the use of SD cards amateurish? smaller, less likely to damage, just as fast, just as big and&#8230;. cheaper! I Guess that the Canon 1DS Mark II is an &#8220;amateur&#8221; camera because it useses SD cards too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
