Comments on: F.E.A.R. 2 is not the sequel to F.E.A.R.

By: PWNAGE

PWNAGE — Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:03:30 +0000

F.E.A.R 2 May not have come after F.E.A.R.,yes, but It is the continuation of F.E.A.R. some amount of minutes before the end of the first game so as far as you are concerned, it IS the rightful sequal to a great FPS game. Idiot.

By: Anton Shea

Anton Shea — Fri, 16 Apr 2010 21:21:51 +0000

F.E.A.R. 2 starts right after the end of F.E.A.R., but with a different main, this does not mean it’s not the sequel. But, if it’s times of proper happening you’re looking for…
F.E.A.R. happens first, followed by immediate going on to F.E.A.R. Extraction Point. Whilst in the middle of extraction point, F.E.A.R. Perseus Madate starts. Now, F.E.A.R. 2 happens after the explosion, but we start in another area of the crash. So technically, once F.E.A.R. ended, all the other F.E.A.R. games made a start, with Extraction Point and F.E.A.R. 2 happening at the same time, with Perseus Mandate in the middle of them both. So if you mean F.E.A.R. 2 is not a DIRECT sequel, then you’re right.

By: sebass

sebass — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:03:08 +0000

OK are you really saying this… just because the old main character is gone does not mean that it is a differnt game. If that was true than than resident evil 2 and 4 shouldn’t be named resident evil. the whole point is that they have something in common. In fear 2 it is Alma Wade and Armacham. Before you post something you might wait so you can campare the games.