<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sony Alpha 800, why not?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.roumazeilles.net/news/en/wordpress/2008/07/11/sony-alpha-800-why-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.roumazeilles.net/news/en/wordpress/2008/07/11/sony-alpha-800-why-not/</link>
	<description>Technology opinions and others</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:46:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.roumazeilles.net/news/en/wordpress/2008/07/11/sony-alpha-800-why-not/#comment-7186</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 09:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.roumazeilles.net/news/en/wordpress/2008/07/11/sony-alpha-800-why-not/#comment-7186</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[More of the possible specification on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.YLovePhoto.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;YLovePhoto&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of the possible specification on <a href="http://www.YLovePhoto.com/" rel="nofollow">YLovePhoto</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: guy villeneuve		</title>
		<link>https://www.roumazeilles.net/news/en/wordpress/2008/07/11/sony-alpha-800-why-not/#comment-7126</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[guy villeneuve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.roumazeilles.net/news/en/wordpress/2008/07/11/sony-alpha-800-why-not/#comment-7126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[it makes some senses as the maxxum 800 had the biggest flash gn also would be ok with less pixels but better noise performance for sure......LIVE VIEW and video with autofocus would help..........]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it makes some senses as the maxxum 800 had the biggest flash gn also would be ok with less pixels but better noise performance for sure&#8230;&#8230;LIVE VIEW and video with autofocus would help&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yves Roumazeilles		</title>
		<link>https://www.roumazeilles.net/news/en/wordpress/2008/07/11/sony-alpha-800-why-not/#comment-7187</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yves Roumazeilles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.roumazeilles.net/news/en/wordpress/2008/07/11/sony-alpha-800-why-not/#comment-7187</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I now doubt that the Sony Alpha 800 would be Full Frame. It would be better understood as a high-end successor to the Sony Alpha 700 (with an APS-C sensor).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I now doubt that the Sony Alpha 800 would be Full Frame. It would be better understood as a high-end successor to the Sony Alpha 700 (with an APS-C sensor).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
